I read Yasmina Khandra´s The
Attack a few year ago. It´s the story of an Arab doctor, Amin Jaafari,
living and working in Tel Aviv. After a suicide attack rocks the city, Jaafari
is called to identify his wife Sihem’s body, one of the victims of the attack.
Little later, he’s confronted with the information that Sihem herself was the
suicide bomber.
Khandra takes us with his
beautiful, sensitive, incisive writing through the different stages in
Jaafari’s emotional state and to his journey in search of answers: from the
pain of losing his wife, to the incredulity when faced with the information
that the woman he loved had committed such a crime, to the confusion and anger
when realizing, little by little, that he was unaware of a number of his wife’s
actions, thoughts and feelings, to the determination to find an explanation
that could help him make sense and the return to a reality he had long left
behind.
I loved Yasmina Khandra´s
book because it shows that friendship, tolerance, understanding and coexistance
are possible, they are one reality. And with this reality as a starting point,
he slowly takes us, following Jaafari’s
quest, into that other reality, which exists right next to the first one,
compromising it, questioning it, every single day: that of millions of
Palestinians in the occupied territories or in exile; that of daily
humiliation, dispair, hopelessness, pain, abuse, death, revolt; that of an
arbitrary rule that bears terrorist suicide bombers, who are venerated as
heroes and martyrs.
Khandra makes us question the first
reality. Is it the product of convenient silences; of ignorance? Is it fake;
fragile; unable to survive if the silence is broken? Or rather the result of
strength and determination, of the informed and thus conscious wish for peace?
The director of The Attack, Ziad Doueri. |
The film The Attack,
by Ziad Doueri, opened this year´s Judaica – Festival of Cinema and Culture in Lisbon. I
went to see it knowing that rarely or never are films as good as the books. The
rule was more than confirmed.
What stroke me the most was
how superficially Doueri dealt with the story. He was not able to give any
depth to the characters, their feelings and views, and more than once I was
left thinking that I was watching a soap opera. Furthermore, he decided to
ignore Yasmina Khandra´s narrative when describing Jaafari’s quest into the
territories and basically presented the Palestinian´s as nothing more than a
big mafia. I got up as soon as the film ended, also puzzled about the ending
that was totally different from that of the book. Just before I left the room,
I was able to hear the film director explaining to the audience that the ending
of the book was not convenient to him, so he chose a different one. Why didn´t
he write the story he wanted instead of ruining Khandra’s?
A scene from the film The Attack. |
Some days later I watched an
interview with Doueri and I realized that there is probably more to it. Talking
about his growing up in Beirut, about his liberal parents, about the Arabs’
taboos with regards to Israel, about how stupid ramadan is, I realized that
Doueri, wishing to be progressive and open-minded and liberal, built his own
version of The Attack with the intention to challenge the Arab point of
view. To challenge by ignoring it, turning it into a caricature. Once again, why
didn´t he write his own story instead of taking advantage of Khandra´s
best-seller?
No comments:
Post a Comment