It’s 125 years since Vincent Van Gogh’s
death. Starting May 3 and for 125 days, the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam will
be answering 125 questions regarding the painter, his life and his work. The
museum invites anyone interested to ask a question to send it through their
website and a page especifically created to present the results of this Q&A
(watch the promotional video and visit the webpage).
The first 8 questions have been answered and I find myself eagerly waiting to see what comes next. It strickes me how simple the basic idea behind the project is and what a wealth of knowledge it’ll help put together: not only with regards to Vincent Van Gogh, but also, and equally importantly, with regards to the Van Gogh Museum’s visitors (both physical and virtual), their interests, existing knowledge and queries and the museum’s current and future response towards them.
The first 8 questions have been answered and I find myself eagerly waiting to see what comes next. It strickes me how simple the basic idea behind the project is and what a wealth of knowledge it’ll help put together: not only with regards to Vincent Van Gogh, but also, and equally importantly, with regards to the Van Gogh Museum’s visitors (both physical and virtual), their interests, existing knowledge and queries and the museum’s current and future response towards them.
Another thing we must mention here is
that this is not an isolated “good idea”. It falls into the museum’s larger
policy of establishing a relationship with people of different backgrounds,
based on the clear mission of making “the work of Vincent van Gogh and
the art of his time accessible for as many people as possible, with the goal to
enrich and inspire them”.
This was also the challenge given to
webdesigners who worked on the museum’s new website, presented in the end of
last year. David van
Zeggeren, of Fabrique, wrote in an article published in the Guardian, that they were precisely
asked to develop a website that would support the mission of the museum. How
did they do it? By creating two distinct areas: Visit the museum and Meet Vincent. “We had to ensure it was
easy for visitors to plan their visit, but also tempt them with inspiring
stories about the artist. (...) With this “Meet Vincent” concept, the team had
to make not only the collection (and thus the museum) accessible, but also the
artist. (...) Each story has been specially written and designed for the website
and offers new approaches to the work of the artist and his contemporaries.”
Answering
people’s particular questions is also the simple basis behind the Brooklyn
Museum’s Ask App, which I mentioned in my last post. Driven by its mission, “to act as a
bridge between the rich artistic heritage of world cultures, as embodied in its
collections, and the unique experience of each visitor”, the Brooklyn Museum is
looking to change (improve) the visitor experience from entry to exit. The Ask App
has involved for more than a year now web, interpretation and curatorial staff
and it’ll be launched in June. All parts of the process have been generously
shared by members of the team on the museum blog, for anyone interested to learn along them. This is a more sophisticated
answer to the need to engage with people in a more personalized and meaningful
way. I find it truly amazing, as it also involves Location Aware Technology, which
is used to tell the staff answering questions which gallery a visitor is
standing in and what works of art are nearby, giving them the opportunity to
give a more complete answer and guide the visitor around. Every step of the
development of the app is being evaluated and sometimes there are simple and
practical consequences, such as rethinking a label, since visitors ask the same
question about a specific work of art.
Despite
the level of sophistication of the two projects being quite different, their
common basis – answering people’s questions – made me bring them together is
this post. I believe there are some clear lessons one can gather from both:
Everything
starts with a clear mission: projects are not being developed simply because
someone had an idea that seemed good or because a commemoration is coming up,
but because they help the museum fulfill its mission. Really, every idea for a
project should be tested against the mission. How often do we do this exercise?
The
right people must be involved: this probably sounds as a luxury in countries
struggling with severe cuts and overworked members of staff doing a bit of
everything. But, if we wish to be relevant and part of people’s lives, a time
comes when priorities need to be set straight and clearly and the objective must
be something more than “OK” iniciatives and “OK” results - even if we insist on
presenting them as “extraordinary”. How soon can we start working on this?
Finally,
evaluation: a clear mission and clear objectives allow for clear evaluation
indicators to be set, so that we are able to monitor if things are developing
according to plan and make the necessary changes. Can we honestly say that the
number of exhibitions presented, the
number of activities proposed and the number of people who attended are good
enough indicators when we present our reports at the end of the year? What are
they telling us – they, alone - about the quality and impact of our work, in
relation to the objectives initially set?
More on this blog
More readings
Maria Isabel Roque, “A pintura que vem até mim”: a imagem ea comunicação do Museu Van Gogh
No comments:
Post a Comment