Image taken from the newspaper Público. Photo: Nuno Ferreira Santos |
It was a good exercise
for all of us the with conversation with the Municipal Councilor for Culture
Catarina Vaz Pinto (CVP) yesterday at the Maria Matos Theatre (MMT). As it has
been a good exercise all the discussion generated after the announcement of her
decision to lease MMT and turn it into a for-profit space with programming for a
larger public.
The meeting began with an
introduction by CVP. She spoke of her responsibility, as Councilor for Culture,
to look at the city of Lisbon as a whole, understand the cultural ecosystem and
identify gaps. She said that the Municipality has got two priorities: the preservation
of memory and cultural diversity. So far so good. Weaknesses in the argumentation
began to emerge as questions about these statements started being asked.
Time and time again,
when citizens took the floor to express their appreciation for and connection
to the MMT project and the MMT space (inseparable, of course, for those who attend
it), CVP replied: "But the project ended with the departure of Mark
Deputter and the other programmers. It's the people who make the places and it
would never be the same. We had to think things over." CVP was sympathetic
to what she called "your mourning”, but she reminded everyone that things
change, that there is resistance to change, but we need to face it and she, being
responsible for culture, has to look for better solutions and to guarantee
cultural diversity. She said we think just about ourselves, but she thinks
about the city as a whole. When questioned about municipal investment in
creating an identity for MMT, CVP responded that MMT has had several
identities: the one of the time it was being managed by Miguel Abreu, then the time
of Diogo Infante and now of Mark Deputter.
I don’t know how the
public reacted to Miguel Abreu's departure in the early 2000s neither do I know
the identity MMT was projecting at the time. I know that the announcement of
Diogo Infante's departure did not cause any negative reactions - as people
quietly followed him to the D. Maria II National Theater, since the identity was
that of the artistic director. What we see now is quite different, however, and
deserves to be evaluated in a different way by those responsible for Culture in
the city, its ecosystem and cultural diversity.
The MMT audiences did not regret Mark Deputter’s departure when it was announced in August 2017. Noone’s griefing, at no time did anyone beg for him to stay, nor did anyone ask for more of the same. Personally, I thought "How good for him and how good for MMT". How good for us, ultimately. On the one hand, curious to see what he shall do at Culturgest (contrary to CVP’s repeated claims, he has already said that he's going to be doing something different than what he did at MMT, as one should expect). On the other hand, with high expectant regarding the way a new artistic director at MMT would respond to the challenge of the unique positioning this theater has in the city.
The MMT audiences did not regret Mark Deputter’s departure when it was announced in August 2017. Noone’s griefing, at no time did anyone beg for him to stay, nor did anyone ask for more of the same. Personally, I thought "How good for him and how good for MMT". How good for us, ultimately. On the one hand, curious to see what he shall do at Culturgest (contrary to CVP’s repeated claims, he has already said that he's going to be doing something different than what he did at MMT, as one should expect). On the other hand, with high expectant regarding the way a new artistic director at MMT would respond to the challenge of the unique positioning this theater has in the city.
The crucial point for
me is here: the unique positioning of MMT in the city of Lisbon, which currently
defines its identity and makes it different from every other cultural space.
CVP believes there is something to gain from the decision she made, that we shall
all be better served. This is because she thinks in "technical"
terms, she says that there will be better conditions for the "experimental
and emerging" and for "children-youth programming." But we, the citizens,
do not go after genders. Should this weigh on our decisions, there is a big
choice in Lisbon. As a citizen, I accepted an invitation from a municipal
theater that assumes a political position. This, in my view, is unique. This is
something that I cannot find in other cultural spaces in Lisbon – at least not
clearly assumed, developed in a coherent and permanent way and with my
participation.
Therefore, it is not at
all obvious or natural to assume that the departure of an artistic director
from a municipal theater puts an end to its mission. It is the responsibility
of the Municipality to guarantee this mission, to guarantee cultural diversity,
to identify gaps, which it is now creating. As I have already said, I am not
discussing genders. I am talking about the distinct invitation this municipal
theatre launched to the public, an invitation which was accepted by some (not
few) and which resulted in the creation of a community: the MMT community. I
would say more: it is irresponsible to destroy a project in which so much was
investigated with the excuse that the artistic director has left. I deeply
respect Mark Deputter, Liliana Coutinho and Pedro Santos. But I do not think
they are the only competent, sensitive, knowledgeable people to serve the MMT
mission. Neither the city, its ecosystem, is limited to the questions raised by
them. The Municipality has an obligation to be able to distinguish between
mission and content and to preserve the vocation of a cultural space which, as citizens
clearly said, is much needed. Perhaps even more so than preserving the space
left empty by the Cornucopia Theater (that is, if they had to choose).
Several citizens
yesterday reaffirmed their appreciation for the MMT project (even without Mark
Deputter). Their appreciation is not for the "experimental" or the
"emergent" or the "contemporary" - no one used these terms
- but for a coherent, solid project that invites them to reflect together and
gives them something that no other cultural space provides them with at this
time. I feel that they were not really heard, I feel that they were regarded
with some condescension for being "sentimental" (rather patronizing,
for my taste). In October, other citizens accepted the invitation to come and
talk with artist Grada Kilomba and many entered this municipal theater for the
first time. CVP was not in that meeting. Those citizens made it clear that they
exist, they are thinking and interested inhabitants of this city, yet largely invisible.
More sentimentalists? After all, who does the Councilor for Culture accept listening
to?
We talked about a lot
of other things yesterday. I was a little disappointed to see that CVP was not
prepared to discuss numbers (numbers of spectators, investment values, leases,
etc.), questions that were certainly expected to come up. She also showed some lack
of knowledge about the type of programming of the MMT, which is worrying
considering the decision she has taken. However, the question that interests me
the most is this:
If one of the
responsibilities of the Councilor for Culture is to study the ecosystem,
identify gaps, seek to preserve cultural diversity, I ask myself: which
citizens did the Councilor for Culture listen to in order to conclude that what
is lacking in the city is a space with a programme for "the general
public" that can be profitable? Who expressed this need? And why is this
need, should it was expressed, more important in the plans for Culture of the
Lisbon City Council than the one expressed by those who attend the MMT?
Let's set Mark Deputter
free. Let’s not hold him accountable for things he is not responsible for. Let’s
allow him to do what he does best and surprise us (hopefully, this is not an
"unconditional love"). Let’s be more demanding with the Lisbon City
Council. The city’s cultural policy is their responsibility. Just like listening,
feeling (yes, also feeling), valuing dialogue with the citizens. The MMT
project does not end because Mark Deputter left. But will the Lisbon City
Council be able to manage the challenge of giving it continuity? A much greater
challenge, much more demanding than leasing the space, a challenge which they
clearly have to assume.
Still on Maria Matos: a theatre's ethos
What Maria Matos means to me (or why did I sign the petition)
The person we need to listen to
No comments:
Post a Comment