Thursday 17 October 2024

Against culture passes

House with a roof but no foundations was a post I wrote in 2011 regarding the initiative of the Brazilian government to give a sort of “culture stipend” to people with low income. It is a case a still frequently bring up in trainings and debates, as it never convinced me it was addressing the real issues. The questions citizens asked at the time were revealing: Can we buy video games with it? Can we pay cable TV? A lady that was interviewed at the time said she thought is was great, as she had never before “dared” to go to the municipal theatre of Rio de Janeiro (“It is so big, so beautiful”, she said, “I never dared”…). More importantly, though, there were the people who asked the difficult questions: how are we supposed to spend it? There’s no bookshop – cinema – museum – theatre where we live.

After that, I repeatedly wrote both on culture stipends as well as on policies of free entry (see at the end of this post). In 2013, I wrote again about the Brazilian initiative, that had inspired similar actions from the US to Lebanon. And again in 2016, when the Italian Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi, announced that the culture pass (a €500-allowance announced in 2015 for every 18-year old to spend on cultural products) was a way of fighting islamic extremism… Some years later, a colleague who had attended a conference in Naples told me that young people would sell their stipend in order to buy other things. The Art Newspaper now confirms: “The programme was also overshadowed by a prolific black market, with recipients trading their funds for mobile phones, computers or cash.” The newspaper also mentions that, at the time the programme was announced, 60% of the eligible young people signed up, but just before the deadline, only 6% had found a way to spend the money. Apart from that, “most Italian towns have no theatre, concert hall, cinema or bookshop in which to use the pass.”

But - despite all the evidence that these initiatives simply allow for “more of the same”, but not “diverse - politicians love announcing free entries and culture passes; a huge step, in their view (and in the view of many cultural professionals) towards the “democratisation of culture”. I never doubted the importance of the financial barrier for many people, I just never thought that culture passes-stipends-bonuses were the answer to that.

And now, The Art Newspaper brings us more on this. The Pass Culture was Emmanuel Macron’s only culture policy proposal when he was elected in 2017, one reads in the article. “The cost ballooned to €260m per year, including €50m for group activities in schools. It became the culture ministry’s highest expense, amounting to double the public support provided to the Musée du Louvre.” And last April, the French President claimed that it was so successful in his country that it should be extended across Europe.

In countries were there are no studies and data, politicians may claim whatever they want. In France, the culture ministry’s auditing body concluded that “It is impossible to show that the programme has fulfilled its mission of public service by enlarging and diversifying cultural practices.” Actually, the report, published in September, reveals that “80% of 18-year-olds have benefited from the pass. In two-and-a-half years, 71% of the 24 million users have bought books, with half of those buying Mangas and comics. Overall, the system mainly benefits teenagers from educated and wealthy families, who already have access to comic books and movies.”

In 2011, I wrote that “It doesn’t seem realistic to me that we continue to use the gratuity argument in support of democracy and equality”. But we do, still in 2024. And this is a way both for politicians and cultural professionals to ignore the real issues regarding access to cultural participation; and our irrelevance. I am not against culture passes, really. I am against the false arguments that support them; I am against their dishonest objectives.

 

More on this blog

House with a roof but no foundations

The difference between ‘more’ and ‘diverse’

Discussing values, from Brazil to Lebanon

Justin Bieber and the fight against Islamic extremism

Government reflections on access to culture

Looking for sandy ground

On free entries

Free entries (i) Museums

Free entries (ii) Theatres

To be or not to be (free on Sundays)? That is not the question

Myths and excuses regarding free admission

To charge on not to charge: the data

No comments: