Rosa Shaw (Photo: Maria Vlachou) |
Meet Rosa Shaw.
She’s the first person to greet us when we enter the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. She’s one of the memorial’s guards and one of the
institution’s faces. She’s polite, she has a good sense of humour, she’s
helpful. If someone looks lost or confused, she doesn’t wait for them to ask
for help, she approaches and tries to see if she can be of assistance. The
uniform could cause some inhibition to the visitors - a permanent concern among
those of us working in the communications field – but, looking at Rosa and the
way she does her job, it becomes clear that, more than a question of aspect,
it’s a question of attitude.
Rosa makes me
think of many guards I have encountered in museums. People who look terribly
bored and tired; or people who avoid eye contact when we enter a room and then
follow us closely, although we are the only visitor in that room; or people who
might be loudly discussing family or union problems, paying no attention to
visitors. Guards of this kind make me think of how much more interesting their
job could be, and how big the benefit for the museum or the cultural
institution they serve, if they were given appropriate training and different
responsibilities - more responsibilities - than just sitting on a chair or standing
at a corner, looking stern and bored, having as little interaction with
visitors as possible.
Guards at the Brooklyn Museum (Photo: Maria Vlachou) |
I am saying this,
because I’ve also had other kinds of experiences. A couple of years ago, I
joined a guided tour to the Pastrana Tapestries exhibition at the National Museum
of Ancient Art in Lisbon. As soon as the tour was over and as I was heading for
the exit, I overheard a guard having a conversation with two ladies, explaining
everything one needed to know about those works of art, but with an enthusiasm
and commitment that equaled those of the education department staff. And in a
language that was much more accessible than that of the texts on the panels.
More recently, while visiting the El Anatsui exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum,
I overheard two guards exchanging views regarding one of the works of art on
display. It was a pleasure listening to them. Later on, one of them greeted a
small group of visitors and offered to take their photo in front of one of the
works, so that they could all be in it. The whole atmosphere was light and
friendly and informal, I felt that it made such a big difference.
Museum guards
might look silent and stern, even threatening some times, but they have eyes
and feelings and opinions regarding the works that surround them. The
Washington Post published a very interesting piece on Washington museum guards
a few weeks ago (read here),
where they would talk about their favourite work of art and the reasons why it
is their favourite. One of them also mentioned how working in a museum awakened
her interest in art and consequently made her look at all things in a different
way. Reading their interviews made me think of how much I would have enjoyed
having a direct conversation with them, both as a visitor and a professional.
Front-of-house
staff in cultural institutions (whether guards, ushers or box office
assistants) are some of the most important people in the team, in terms of
institutional marketing. They are the face, they are the voice, they are the
attitude. They are the ears too, as they get closer to the visitors/audiences
than most of the administrative staff ever get. Front-of-house staff have a
decisive role in the shaping of the quality of the whole experience of visiting
a cultural institution. A disappointing exhibition or a performance that turned
out to be a disaster will not make people keep away for ever; people take a
risk and know that it might not fulfill their expectations. On the other hand,
if someone is not well treated, if they come across staff who are impolite or
in a bad mood, who lack information, who are unhelpful or show that they don’t
care, this might definitely determine if someone will come back or not. Even
when we have to make a choice between two interesting exhibitions or two
interesting shows, it’s very probable that customer care, the place where we
feel that we are better treated, will make all the difference in our decision.
Despite their
strategic position and role, though, front-of-house staff get to be very
neglected by management; underestimated too. They are not given the appropriate
training in public relations and customer care; they are not given information
about what it is that they are guarding or selling or taking people to their
seats to see; quite often, they are not even given important information about
what’s going on in the institution, in terms of programming or timetables or
prices/discounts or other practical information the public might be looking for
(have you ever experienced the discomfort and embarrassment of a Front-of-House
member of staff who can’t answer a logical question or, worse, who is informed
by a visitor on what is happening in the institution he/she is working for?);
they feel frustrated by the fact that their opinion is not taken into
consideration, even when it concerns visitor opinions or comments which they
are simply passing on, as they are the ones who hear or receive them.
Front-of-house staff don’t ‘just’ guard or ‘just’ sell
or ‘just’ answer the phone or ‘just’ take people to their seats. They are a
valuable part of the team, they are the most visible part. They are the ones
that welcome people in, talk to them, promote the institution – not only its
contents but also its vision and principles. It seems only too obvious and
natural to me that they would be given the tools to do their work and to do it
well. Rosa seems to be pleased in doing her job. And it’s certainly a pleasure to watch her doing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment