“I think it’s the
responsibility of an artistic director, or let’s say, the collective, which is
the artistic institution, to say here’s the pull that I’m feeling in our
community. But, after all, isn’t it our responsibility to have a sort of
eloquence or articulation around that, that maybe the community itself feels
but does not deliver as a particular statement of need? So, I think being
sensitive to that, to me, is leadership, saying here’s what we feel is in the
air and what we think is worthy of giving voice to.”
I’ve often quoted these words of Martha Lavey, a long-time director of Steppenwolf Theater in
Chicago, who passed away in 2017. These days, my mind goes even more often back
to them, as they beautifully resume the purpose of the work of an artistic
director or cultural organisation.
I thought about this when I saw
a video made by Portuguese artists and technicians entitled “Postpone us but don’t
cancel us now”. It occurred to me that this request, this view or suggestion
considering the situation we´re experiencing did not make sense. Not if we see
a purpose, an intention, behind the work of an artistic director or a cultural
organisation; not if we perceive this work as a way of creating a relationship
with the communities it aims to address, their aspirations, anxieties, doubts,
as well as their pursuit of happiness.
I wrote on my facebook page:
“The video is very well done.
But, thinking about the message conveyed, talking to colleagues, looking at our
present and trying to imagine our future, the call for postponing raises, in my
view, more and more questions. What we know today is not what we knew three
weeks ago and it is not be what we will know in six, nine, twelve months. Who
we are today is not who we were three weeks ago and is not who we will be in
six, nine, twelve months. What makes sense today is not what made sense three
weeks ago and is not what will make sense six, nine, twelve months from now... At
this moment, it seems to me that we should assume the cancellations and pay the
professionals what we have to pay. As for postponing… we’ll have to wait and see.”
Some colleagues expressed their
agreement, others reminded us that there can’t be a “one-fits-all” solution.
And there can’t indeed. The cultural sector is not one homogeneous world and
each area has got its specificities. Actually, it seems that the Portuguese law
regarding cancellations and postponements had so far had the area of music (concerts
and festival) at its core. The video, though, made me specifically think about
theatres and cultural centres with an artistic direction. A colleague with this
kind of responsibilities criticised my post. Here’s a summary of his argument:
- Postponing is fundamental in order to fulfil the agreement of co-producing and presenting a performance;
- If projects are not postponed, artists cannot present their work and lose the contact with audience;
- We managed to postpone our shows so that everything will be presented on stage;
- Are you defending that artists should suffer damages although they had scheduled presentations?
- This is the moment to decide next season’s programming. One cannot “wait” and risk condemning the next season, thus doubly harming the artists.
I read carefully these
arguments, grateful to be given an insight into an artistic director’s concerns
and priorities. Nevertheless, postponing made even less sense to me after this.
First of all, I don’t wish to
seem insensitive towards the situation of the artists, much less cause them
further harm or distress. That said, is the programming of a cultural
organisation only about the artists? Or rather about a larger community, of
which the artists, other culture professionals, as well as the people we call
the “audience” form part? Will a commission or co-production agreed months ago,
as a result of a specific intention, be relevant for this community when we are
back? What does “be back” actually mean at this point? What form will it take?
Is it realistic to believe that in a few months we will be celebrating a usual
season opening? Is this about postponing “business as usual” or rather an
opportunity to transform it?
There are many questions for
which we have no answers at this point. Our reality keeps evolving, keeps changing.
Perhaps, the only thing we might say we know for sure is that we will not have
a “normal” season opening in September, not the one we had planned. The issues
will be different, our psychology will be different, the spaces and formats
will probably have to be different too. This will be a slow return to the
normality we long for (of being together, of touching each other, of sharing
the experience of a performance). At the same time, it is probably the moment
to think about the “normality” we don’t wish to return to (check out the questionnaire Where to land after the pandemic?).
How shall we survive this? How
can we adapt in order to survive? What will make sense? What do we wish for? What
don’t we want to go back to? I believe that the answers to these questions will
not come from the postponement of previously programmed shows, at least, not
each and every one of them and not in the way they had been planned. It would
make sense to look for them together with our communities, artists included. “Don’t
stick to the plan, but stick to the person”, my friend and colleague Chiara
Organtini said in our latest RESHAPE meeting.
In this process of re-considering
our work and place in our community we will disagree. It is natural and it is
necessary, we haven’t been through this before. But this is the way of refining
and adjusting our thoughts and imagining our future together.
No comments:
Post a Comment